In sections 24 and 25 of Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event) we read about the aberrant demands on inceptual thinking, sovereignty over the masses thru the shackles of organization, and the proclivity to think of one’s self as an objective “examplar” of the species “human being,” concluding with a conversation about the purpose…

In Section 23, entitled Inceptual Thinking – Why Thinking Out of the Beginning, we read about confronting the end of the first beginning, the greatest occurrence being the most intimate event, letting beyng protrude into being, the sigetic or logic of silence, the uselessness of philosophical thinking, and, along with the question in the title,…

In Section 22 of Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event), Heidegger continues his discourse on “inceptual thinking.” Inceptual thinking is the “inventive thinking of the truth of beyng,” it “opens up what is most question-worthy,” and it manifests its own “grounding, gathering, and retaining power.” And in the end, “the greatest occurrence, the most intimate…

In Section 21 of Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event), entitled “Inceptual Thinking (Projection),” we read that “the inventive thinking of the truth of beyng is essentially projection.” What projection is, how it works, and who/what is the projector is then covered/revealed. From this vantage, we move inward and discuss repetitive thoughts, ways of subverting…

In Ep 24, we complete our reading of Section 19. We discuss the life of those who sacrifice themselves in the preparation for the other beginning, meditation on the self as the bringing of selfhood into decision, the constant emergence of the “always still other,” the pitfalls of the cult of the machinated personality, and…

In Ep 23, we start reading Section 19, entitled “Philosophy (On the question: who are we?). Here, Heidegger asserts that “philosophy is meditation on beyng, which is necessarily meditation on one’s self.” But the question – “who are we?” – carries a host of complications, obfuscations, and assumptions that prevent us from answering it in…

In this episode we read Section 18 of Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event), which is titled “The Powerlessness of Thinking.” The obverse of this, however, is what we gather from the section, i.e. the power of essential thinking. Essential thinking is separate from machination and lived experience, takes place in the solitude of the…

We read Section 17 of Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event). Titled “The Necessity of Philosophy,” this section centers on how philosophy is grounded in “the plight.” Coming from the German word “Not,” which means need, predicament, worry, hardship, suffering, necessity, and more, the term is here translated as “the plight,” which is what “propels…

In this episode we read Section 16 of Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event) and discuss how philosophy is useless yet sovereign knowledge, the need for meditation to de-fix from the “here and now,” how meditation thereby “necessarily becomes the question of the truth of the history of philosophy,” and ultimately how the primary question…

In this episode we read section 15 and parts of section 16 of Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event) and discuss what the “philosophy of a people” is, how that philosophy must belong to “its first, essential beginning” so as to keep the people from being “led into a distorted essence by an alleged people,”…